To assume, as Beard so commonly does, that the fear of the misuse of power by majorities was either peculiar to the Federalists
or more ardent with them than with their opponents, is mistaken. Indeed it was rather the anti-Federalists who were most deeply disturbed by the prospect of majority rule; they, rather than the Federalists, were the “men of little faith.” Can someone paraphrase Please thank you.
It is wrong to assume that the Federalists were more critical of the possibility of abuses of power by a government that the Anti-Federalists, just as Beard often does. Actually, the Anti-Federalists saw the likelihood of undemocratic majority rule with deeper concern than the Federalists did. If we were going to call someone "men of little faith" with fairness, it would be the Anti-Federalists and not the Federalists.
Here's a reason why: Africans were strangers to the Americans. Because the Africans were poor, they didn't have any allies to watch out for them or to protect them.
The glorious revolution of 1688 in Britain had given more
power to the House of Commons in parliament and to King William II and
Queen Mary II. The combination of the power from the parliament and the King and
Queen made the platforms of the government more credible and reliable.
