Answer:
The answer is "The Parallel Postulate
".
Step-by-step explanation:
When the two lines will cross where angles of the amount are less than 180 degrees and the direct line overlaps two direct lines, that produces 2 ways the reinforcement on the same side to less than 180 degrees if extended indefinitely from the other hand. All this means that there is only one segment on the same plane parallel to a certain line at any point, not with a line.
Im not sure if this is correct but x=4 double roots
Answer: p=5+3/2 or p=5-3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
