Which expressions are equivalent to the expression 32 ÷ (8 – 4)? Choose exactly two answers that are correct. A. 18 – 2 ÷ 2 B. 4
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
13, 14
Step-by-step explanation:
The parameters of the numbers are;
A whole number value = 2 × Another number + 6
The sum of the two numbers is less than 50
Given that the first number is equal to more than twice the second number, we have that the first number is the larger number, while the second number is the smaller number
Where 'x' represents the second number, we get;
x + 2·x + 6 < 50
Simplifying gives;
3·x + 6 < 50
x < (50 - 6)/3 = 14.
x < 14.
Therefore, the numbers for which the inequality holds true are numbers less than 14.. From the given option, the numbers are 13, and 14.
Firstly, we'll fix the postions where the women will be. We have
forms to do that. So, we'll obtain a row like:
The n+1 spaces represented by the underline positions will receive the men of the row. Then,
Since there is no women sitting together, we must write that . It guarantees that there is at least one man between two consecutive women. We'll do some substitutions:
The equation (i) can be rewritten as:
We obtained a linear problem of non-negative integer solutions in (ii). The number of solutions to this type of problem are known:
[I can write the proof if you want]
Now, we just have to calculate the number of forms to permute the men that are dispposed in the row:
Multiplying all results: