Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer: Improvements in agriculture.
Explanation:
I believe through conquest and colonization
Answer:
the answer is b
Explanation:
Many times, the House and Senate pass slightly different versions of a bill. If this happens both the House and the Senate appoint conferees to work out a compromise. ... If both the House and the Senate pass the bill from the conference committee, then the bill is sent to the President.
Hope this helps! if not then my Apologizes!
<span>During the middle kingdom, Egyptians captured the lands "Nubia" -a region along the Nile rivers and the "Syria"-a country in Western Asia, bordering Lebanon and the Mediterranean Sea to the west, Turkey to the north, Iraq to the east, Jordan to the south, and Israel to the southwest.in Palestine</span>
