<span>The power taken by Ferdinand III for the Holy Roman Empire's constitution was taken away and given back to the rulers of the German states. The rulers of German states were able to independently decide their religious worship. Catholics and Protestants were seen as equal. Calvinism was given legal recognition. Protestantism was recognized as a religion. All parties would now recognize the Peace of Augsburg of 1555.
</span>
As a women prejudice I encounter is sexism, a plan to address this is to get rid of wage gaps across the world. Push for more inclusive programs for young women such as sport and hobbies. Take down stigmas behind women and push a narrative of equality for all.
i don’t really know if this is what you are looking for but i hope it helps
Assigns who will write the Court's opinion and can also choose to write it his or herself.
Answer:
Explanation:
D: There is nothing voluntary about paying taxes. We have to do it.
A: Maybe. My father felt that way. "Thank goodness I have enough money to afford to pay taxes."
B: I would pick this one. You like good roads and a good education system? Then pay your taxes to maintain these thihngs.
C and E: Neither of these strike me as the reason for paying taxes. It is not really a thing we do joyfully. Nor is it a thing that we do to show that we are civic minded.
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
