Newark International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, was the departure point for Flight 93. The plane took off from Terminal A, Gate 17.
<h3>What was the target of Flight 93?</h3>
The primary instigators of the assaults, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, have claimed that the planned target was the United States Capitol Building. While the hijackers were attempting to seize control of the plane, the pilots may have taken steps such as disconnecting the autopilot to thwart the hijackers.
Thus, Option C is the correct option.
For more information about Flight 93 refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/16364080
<span>A wildcat strike is a strike action undertaken by
unionized workers without union leadership's authorization, support, or
approval; this is sometimes termed an unofficial industrial. Thus your answer is 'a strike not approved by a union'.</span>
Answer:
<h2>It's nothing you only have to tell months population!</h2>
Answer: all of the above
Most times in history the answer is all of the above.But they all applied to the effects of the homestead act .
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
