I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
<h2>
The evidence of the risk for mass wasting and coastal erosion might include the following indicators:
</h2><h2>
</h2>
Talus piles or large boulders at the base of a slope: The piling of small rock fragment would be due to continued erosion that was once present on the slope that has formed lately.
Telephone poles or trees tilted at an angle: These might indicate that the ground as the base is undergoing settling.
If a beach house, artificial structures such as jetties or seawalls: These would mean that there is an apparent erosion going on and the seawalls and jetties are to protect the base of the beach house from eroding.
Your right it’s traditions
Is composed of<span> three distinct volcanic cones: Kibo, the highest; Mawenzi at 5,149 metres (16,893 ft); and Shira, the shortest at 4,005 metres (13,140 ft).
HOPE THIS HELPS!!!</span>
