Answer:
Diatonic Scale.
Explanation:
1)The Diatonic Scale uses 5 whole steps and 2 half steps, i.e. the 7 pitches also called "natural: Do Re Mi Fa Sol La Ti Do" (C major scale).
2)To create the "Do Re Mi Fa Sol La Ti Do" the scale in which most instruments are tuned in, we follow this interval arrangement.
Do-Re (1 step)
Re-Mi (1 step)
Mi -Fa (1 half step)
Fa-Sol (1 step)
Sol-Lá (1 step)
Lá-Si (1 step)
Ti-Do (half step)
Answer:
A) Those solutions may make the road safer, but increasing the driving age is proven to save significantly more lives, according to studies comparing different state laws.
Explanation:
Counterclaim are claim made to rebut a claim or statement and it is the opposite of Argument.
Considering the information provided, The solutions provided to reduce the occurrence of teen drivers accident is to increase the age limit and make the roads safe for everyone, is the Claim.
The counterclaim will be the alternative solution that can be provided for the claim, which is that there are other ways to prevent these incidence from happening, option C is an example of this, Any law that regulates teenage driving could save lives, whether it increases the driving age, increases the penalty for driving without a seat belt, or limits who can be in the car.
The possible and logical rebuttal to the counterclaim which support the claim is Option A
Those solutions may make the road safer, but increasing the driving age is proven to save significantly more lives, according to studies comparing different state laws.
Answer:
Option a. The visuospatial sketchpad and the phonological loop each angle one task
Explanation:
The task is easier to handle if the work is held together in the two work areas. This enables a person to work much faster and also more efficiently. The visuospatial sketchpad and the phonological loop each angle one task. Placing these at such an orientation allows the work to be done much faster.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
Hopefully i’m right i think it’ll be All of the above i would go with that one but if i’m wrong correct me please
