Answer:
Mass society theory
Explanation:
Sometimes the motivations for large protests organized by college activists are criticized. Highly organized and attended protests in Washington, D.C., are seen as "spring break" for activists, who take part more for an escape and to belong to something than for anything else. What theory would support this critique?
Mass society theory is one of the earliest theories of social movement, mass society theory is a social movement that attract socially isolated people(individuals) seeking a sense of identity and purpose, it argue that individual in a large society who feel insignificant are brought together by a sense of belonging in which movement member would not have as an individual.
Mass society is a complex concept that it basic idea might be used by extremist movement to lure venerable individual
ideologically this concept of mass society has been used by conservative thinkers and other organisation of the society to express dismay about it process that individuals who partook in protests are just people who are socially isolated with no sense of actual commitment but for significant sake and sense of belonging.
Answer: c. Jeremy has automatized his handwriting skills and may have improved his effectiveness in writing
Explanation:
Writing and understanding what's been wrote by the writer and the audience could be on different plain many times. Some individuals find it easier and faster to write what they can easily read and write fast to coup with their writing situation, in this scenario, their major concern is how they can write and read and not the concern of others. In many instances this could be as a result of fast writing or someone experiencing writing difficulty and wants to write what suites themselves. This is Jeremy's case; his interest is himself.
Answer:
impress American Indians with their power.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: precedent
In social setting, we can see a precedent in court ruling.
When a supreme court ruled a controversial case, the other courts would most likely use the ruling as a precedent to settle similar cases that might appear in the future.
I think the answer is they were competing for land and gold, but I am not 100% sure.
