Here are the common technical causes of analysis paralysis:
Analysis barely gives a clear answer as to what discussion is best.
The purpose of the analysis is not sufficiently clear, so analysts produce data that doesn't shed any light on what action to take.
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
Answer this question using YTM, coupon rate, price and par value relationship/rules.
If YTM > coupon rate, then Price < Par value
If YTM < coupon rate, then Price > Par value
If YTM = coupon rate, then Price = Par value
In this case, the assumption is that YTM > coupon rate, hence based on the above rules, the Price or market value of the bond will be < Par value. This makes the statement true.
Answer:Argosy Journal $
Date
March 31,2019
FUTA tax expenses Dr 1507
FUTA tax payable Cr 1507
Narration. Records of amount of futa tax payable.
April 30,2019
Investment- First security national bank Dr 1507
Bank account Cr 1507
Narration. Investment deposit to first security national bank
Explanation:
The liability to pay the Futa tax is represented in the Argosy account as an expenses to the income statement and a liability awaiting payment by Argosy.
The deposit of the amount of the tax to security bank account does not represents a payment of the liability but a transaction between the Argosy and the bank.
Answer:
85%
Explanation:
With regards to the information above, predetermined overhead will be computed as;
Predetermined overhead = (Estimated overhead / Expected labor cost) × 100
Estimated overhead = $85,000
Expected labor cost = $100,000
Then,
Predetermined overhead = ($85,000 / $100,000) × 100
Predetermined overhead = 85%
Therefore, its predetermined overhead rate for the next period should be 85%
