What was the significance, other than the obvious harm to US forces, of the terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000?

2 answers:

6 0

So the question ask on to state the significance other that the obvious harm to US forces, of the terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000 and the best answer would be that Bin laden and al-Qaeda were not frighten or terrified by the reprisal of the US for their terrorist attack. I hope you are satisfied with my answer. <span />

vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago

4 0

It demonstrated that bin Laden and al-Qaeda were not intimidated by the United States reprisal for their terrorist acts

You might be interested in

Country that borders texas

frozen [14]

The country that borders Texas is Mexico.

5 0

3 years ago

olchik [2.2K]

Antietam is the bloodiest day in American history

5 0

2 years ago

1. What was the most unusual aspect of Stalin's partnership with Britain and the U.S.?

natulia [17]

Answer: He did not support their goals for a democratic post-war world

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What sea is located at 45'N and 30'E

kozerog [31]

I think the sea of russia

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 encouraged American Indians to live freely on unoccupied lands. divide their land into 160

dexar [7]

Answer:

C. sell unoccupied lands.

Explanation:

The Indian Appropriations Act comprises of several landmark acts that were passed by the Congress of the United States of America between the 19th and 20th century.

In 1885, Congress passed an act known as the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 so as to mitigate or forestall several attempts of encroachment into the Indian Territory by the Oklahoman Boomers. Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 was mainly to avail the Indians and all Indian tribes the ability to sell any unoccupied land in their possession or have claimed to be theirs.

Hence, the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 encouraged American Indians to sell unoccupied lands.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers