1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arada [10]
3 years ago
12

Charles Evans Hughes said dissenting opinions were “an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future

day.” what did he mean? A. Justices who dissent are less intelligent than the majority of the court. B. Justices who dissent are considering the precedents set by past decisions. C. Justices who dissent often feel angry about how the majority of the court interprets the law. D. Justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.
History
1 answer:
11111nata11111 [884]3 years ago
5 0

<u>Answer:</u>

Justices who dissent may think that future generations will see the issue differently.

Option: (D)

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • Charles Evans Hughes was an American politician from Republican party.
  • He was the 36th governor of New York, 11th chief justice of united states and 44th United states Secretary of states.
  • According to the statement judiciary contains or bounds goods and evils. Evils, here is whatever contradicts the constitution and hinders the will of people and goods are the definite end like liberty, freedom, equality, justice.
You might be interested in
Each phrase from this section of the declaration of independence begins with the word 'for', which is referring to the actions o
dexar [7]

Answer:  b. King George III

Details:

Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king, George III, had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  

Jefferson's list included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some limitations to tribal self-governance?
Vika [28.1K]

The tribal self-governance comes with some limitations, some of which are slow social progress, ineffective healthcare, and partial power over the governed territory.

Explanation:

There are many areas that have the states of reserves, which basically mean they are areas where the indigenous tribes have members living there, practice their own lifestyle, and have self-governing (in most cases). The governments have basically granted these lands to the indigenous people, and they enjoy great autonomy. The people in the reserves are self-governing, thus they make their own rules and laws.

While this may seem good, it doesn't come without problems in practice. The organization is often on very low level, which in turn makes the governing of the area of low quality, and the people often tend to abuse that. The social progress also tends to be somewhat weird and not achieving what has been the initial purpose. The healthcare is too on very low level, which leads to much higher death rates, both in adults and infants. The prime reason for this is practicing the traditional medicine. While the traditional medicine is very effective for some things and even outperforms the pharmaceuticals, for some things it just doesn't have proper solution.

Learn more about autonomy brainly.com/question/536789

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
After the French and Indian war how did Great Britain try to prevent further conflicts between the colonist and the native Ameri
Vilka [71]

Britain gave out the proclamation of 1763 which banned colonists from going west to the Appalachian mountains and into the Indian territory because Britain did not want to start another costly war

7 0
4 years ago
Which if the following is an example of a mandatory civic responsibility?
olga nikolaevna [1]

Explanation:

volunteering in the community.

3 0
3 years ago
What did the British do to make the Americans feel like they weren't equal
Airida [17]

Answer:In short, the British treated their colonies in vastly different ways, both across different regions and within the same colonies over time.  

The British Empire was never a consistent empire. Across various colonies, there were different raisons d’être and methods of organization for each one. Even within America, different Colonies were founded for entirely different reasons. Virginia started out as a mercantile colony run by a company; Massachusetts was originally a Puritan theocracy; New York was a crown colony taken over from the Dutch; and Maryland and Pennsylvania were religiously tolerant colonies governed by (relatively) benign hereditary feudal rulers (called proprietors), the Barons Calvert and the Penn family. South Carolina, with its rice and indigo plantations, was more akin to a Caribbean colony than its continental neighbors.* At the same time that the American Colonies were emerging, the East India Company established outposts in India, and the Royal African Company did much the same in Africa. None of them were uniformly governed or similar in character; the British government occasionally took notice but generally was not involved in their governance.

Explanation: hi ;0

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name two resources that support modern settlements by providing jobs.
    11·2 answers
  • Why do you think Alexander’s soldiers were willing to follow him for so many years, over so many miles, and after so many battle
    9·1 answer
  • Presidential nominations for U.S. Supreme Court Justices
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of the movement to stop the Equal Rights Amendment?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of these is a powerful determinant of status in Latin America?
    10·1 answer
  • What change occurred after the South African War.
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the causes and effects of the iconoclast controversy of the 8th and 9th century and the 11th century Christian schism b
    15·1 answer
  • (DUE TODAY NEED IT IMMEDIATELY — this set of questions should be answered individually, all questions from the “bud, not buddy b
    9·2 answers
  • During the franco-prussia war, italy sided with and reclaimed
    15·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the law of suspects?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!