1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ki77a [65]
3 years ago
10

Under the Truman Doctrine, the United States provided assistance to

History
2 answers:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
7 0
Just learned this hope it helps

Gnom [1K]3 years ago
7 0

<em>Correct answer if looking for a general answer</em>:  The US provided assistance to <u>countries fighting a communist takeover</u>.

<em>If looking for specific countries as the answer:</em> Greece and Turkey

Explanation/detail:

The Truman Doctrine was first stated by the president to Congress in 1947, saying:  "It must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures."  Essentially, the Truman Doctrine pledged American effort elsewhere in the world to check the spread of communist and Soviet influence.  The policy was first put into action in 1948 by providing economic support to Greece and Turkey to stave off communist movement in those countries.

You might be interested in
What was an effect of the increased farm mechanization in the south that began in the 1960s?
JulijaS [17]
Farm workers lost their jobs.
Farmers could have more land under cultivation.
Unemployed farm workers moved into cities.
8 0
3 years ago
How did Rome become more democratic in its government?
butalik [34]

Answer:

Under the Republic, power was shared among many officeholders and limited to short terms. Augustus altered this system by taking many of the offices and their powers for himself while maintaining the idea that these were still separate offices that could, at least in theory, be transferred to someone else.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Explain how the U.S. supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona has impacted society?
andriy [413]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>

<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>

<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which action shows that President Theodore Roosevelt did not always rely on military force in foreign policy?
taurus [48]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the constitution making process face crisis of acceptance in the United Pakistan?
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

By the end of World War II, the British imperial government granted independence to its Indian colony and for that matter the British Parliament enacted the Indian Independence Act, 1947. Under the Act, the British Crown relinquished its sovereign powers over India and transferred those powers to the newly established dominions of India and Pakistan on 14 August 1947. The Government of India Act, 1935, hitherto the constitution of British India, was amended to bring it in consonance with the aims and objectives of independence as laid down in the 1947 Act. The combination of these two constitutional instruments served as an interim constitutional order for both countries until their respective constituent assemblies adopted their own constitutions.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The two main kinds of slavery were _____. chattel and free, free and indentured, indentured and chattel, chattel and servitude
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes the work of the code talkers
    12·1 answer
  • In 1988, Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev introduced a series of reforms designed to give new freedoms to the people, including
    15·1 answer
  • What was the name of the man who later became the buddha and founded the religion of buddhism??
    7·1 answer
  • Romeo decides to attend the Capulets’ party because he wants to
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! I need answers before 12am please!!!
    13·1 answer
  • In the cities of the indus valley civilization why were houses located near rivers or streams
    9·2 answers
  • Why would Britain’s larger population give it an advantage during the war?
    6·2 answers
  • Where did the Islamic Empire originally begin? Please include the nation and major cities
    14·1 answer
  • What are the overall powers of the legislative branch?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!