Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
Answer:
The experimental design is called Between Subjects Design or Independet Measure.
Explanation:
In the experimental design "Independet Measures" you have different groups. Each group is tested under certain conditions whereas a member of one group cannot be part of another group. A commonly known case were this experimental design is used is drug testing. One group is given the medication whereas the other group receives the placebo.
Answer:
D. African Americans is the correct answer.
Explanation:
According to Jane Jacobs, the circumstance that would be most safe for city dwellers will be a busy street with many shoppers, workers, and sightseers walking around.
According to Jane Jacobs, a city that is busy is considered to be the safest for city dwellers.
When the city is busy, people are present in shops, roads, and other places. In this case, there will be less chance for misfortune to happen because an attacker will fear the people that are present around. Hence, when the city is busy and people are either going to work, are present in shops, are working etc, there will be fewer chances of an attack and the city will be safe during this time.
To learn more about city, click here:
brainly.com/question/29704989
#SPJ4
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.
