A student is writing a paper about why it's worth the expense of upgrading exercise facilities for college students who aren't o
n athletic teams. Here is the outline for his essay: Paragraph 1: Introduction
Paragraph 2: Reason #1: New students will be more likely to come to the college because of the workout facilities.
Paragraph 3: Reason #2: Current students will spend money in the snack bar attached to the exercise facilities.
Paragraph 4: Reason #3: Healthier students are better for the college.
Paragraph 5: Conclusion
A counterclaim that he wants to include in the essay is: "Nonathletes do not bring in revenue from sports events, so the upgrades are not worth the cost." Where in his essay should the author respond to this counterclaim?
A. Paragraph 2 B. Paragraph 3 C. Paragraph 4 D. Paragraph 1
If we want to persuade the college officials to permit themselves the cost of upgrading exercise facilities for non-athletes, we must think of a way to remunerate their effort, as students who are not on any team do not <em>bring revenue</em>.
And it is exactly the objective of the thirdparagraph. It is true that the new upgraded facilities benefit the budget in no way, yet there is a possibility of a profit: a snack bar should be attached to the facility. That way <em>students who use the facility</em> will eventually <em>start using the snack bar</em>, too.
Explanation: Philllis Wheatley's description of mother earth having offspring and nations gazing at scenes are not exaggerations, but rather putting human nature attributes to these objects.
It's a narrative technique in which the narrator only understands one character's thoughts and emotions, while other characters are only shown externally. So the Third-Person Limited Narrator knows everything.
