Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
Well i'm sorry i cant answer this cause i think it needs to come from your knowledge not any one else's. Cause once you write what somebody else put down you'll be plagerizing. Then you want us to write 750 to 2,500 words no. Im sorry i'm not doing that.
Plagerizing is just for the writing part. Not math,or science or non of that.
A. Recognizing there is a problem.
(I think)
Answer:
choice a
Explanation:it would make sense if you say he dinosaurs have gone extinct, but we still don know the reason for their extinction. hope this helped. have a nice day!!
