1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
3 years ago
14

In your opinion, what would have happened had the Founding Fathers chosen to simply modify the Articles of Confederation?

History
1 answer:
victus00 [196]3 years ago
6 0
This is of course impossible to tell, but most agree that if the Articles of Confederation hadn't been replaced by the more powerful Constitution, the federal government wouldn't have had the power to tax the states and therefore wouldn't have been able to re-pay its war debt--causing the new nation to crumble.
You might be interested in
What are some examples of England exerting greater control over its colonies
Norma-Jean [14]

One thing England did that the colonist didn't like was making them fight for England in the the French and Indian war.After the war England then started taxing the colonies for England's debt.

Hope this answers your question

6 0
3 years ago
Regarding the Atlantic charter, how was the Soviet Union different than the United States and Great Britain? The United States a
erica [24]

The USA and GB did not seek to obtain new lands

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement about changes that occurred during the Industrial Revolution is true?
kolezko [41]
The best option from the list would be that "<span>d. Many people moved from farms and small towns to cities to find employment in textile factories," since there were more jobs with relatively higher pay in these areas. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy.

Explanation:

This is true, while the rest are false. Representative democracy was designed for large groups, not small, and direct democracies are designed for small, not large groups. The last option is wrong because the reason citizens elect their representative is so they can represent their desires and needs. And as for the 2nd option that representative democracy is modern and direct democracy is ancient, that just isn't a valid reason.

3 0
3 years ago
What did John C. Fremont say about California?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

He said he would make California a great state.

Explanation:

All leaders would say that.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Stanley lieberson's research on first names in the united states focused on which phenomenon? question 2 options: the increase o
    8·1 answer
  • What were the effects of world war one and world war two on social and cultural life in Nevada.
    9·2 answers
  • What do the journeys of the polos represent about European society during the high middle ages?
    15·1 answer
  • What did president kennedy send to the universities of alabama and mississippi in 1963?
    14·2 answers
  • The 7th and 8th centuries were a period of turmoil for Byzantium. This period saw the loss of the Eastern provinces to conquest
    15·2 answers
  • In which trimester does the following occur? Fingers and toes occur A: third B: second C: first
    7·2 answers
  • When did Columbus land in the Americas, starting a period of exploration and colonization? *
    12·2 answers
  • What was an important provision of the Treaty of Paris?
    8·2 answers
  • To what extent did the Dutch Golden Age exemplify the international connections during the Age of Exploration?
    14·1 answer
  • What is nirvana? How did Siddhartha Gautama achieve it?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!