1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinil7 [7]
3 years ago
5

If the meaning of a passage is not explicitly stated in the text, it may be characterized as

English
2 answers:
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Inferred

Meanings of passages can be explicitly stated as in “This passage is about…”  However, if the meaning of a passage is not explicitly stated, it will be inferred in much the way words have a denotation and a connotation where a denotation is the explicit meaning of the word, and the connotation is the implied/inferred meaning because of the ideas invoked.  Thus, readers of passages with no explicitly communicated meaning will deduce/conclude meaning based upon implied meanings and evidence presented.    

baherus [9]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: inferred

An inferred meaning is one that is not explicitly stated by the author, but that is hinted at throughout a passage. This is usually done through the use of various rhetorical and literary devices, such as characterization, symbols, motifs, setting and mood.

You might be interested in
Question 4) Choose the word that best fits this definition. To bring about by force. A) impose, B) import, C) impure. Question 5
NeTakaya

Answer:

question 4:to impose  

question 5: permit  

question 6: spectator

question 7: repellent

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Write a short paragraph on an analysis of the novel "Cry, the Beloved Country."
Vladimir79 [104]
In Alan Paton’s Cry, the Beloved Country, John Kumalo and Dubula are united in their opposition to South Africa’s racial injustices. But while Kumalo enumerates grievances without suggesting realistic solutions, Dubula represents positive, pragmatic change—not to mention the possibility of cooperation between whites and blacks. Paton contrasts Kumalo and Dubula to argue that a policy of cooperation and optimism is a far more effective political strategy than attempting to stir up anger and stoking a community’s desire for vengeance.

On the surface, Dubula and John Kumalo seem bonded by their desire to end the tyranny of whites over blacks in South Africa. They are often described respectively as the “heart” and “voice” of the movement for racial equality, nicknames that suggest they are part of one crusading body. The narrator notes that both men have rejected the Christian Church, which pays its white officials higher salaries than its black officials and offers only lip service to the idea that blacks deserve equal status. This shared action shows that both men have a common interest in weakening institutions that reinforce the notion of black inferiority. Both men make concerted efforts to promote black citizens’ economic interests: Kumalo with his calls for an end to the Church’s oppressiveness and Dubula with his demands for a bus boycott. In the novel’s early scenes, the men seem to be one and the same, heroic yet interchangeable figures in the struggle for black equality.

As the story unfolds, however, Paton makes it clear that John Kumalo primarily relies on anger and grievances to mobilize his black followers. Upset by the Church’s practices, he does not attempt to reform the institution or set up a useful alternative for his people, but merely encourages impotent rage throughout Johannesburg. Suspicious that tribal customs are a white tool for suppressing black independence, Kumalo flat-out rejects the entire set of customs, including the useful tribal traditions of monogamy and family bonding. (His disgusted brother notes that Kumalo has not selected new or different customs, but has instead replaced a set of flawed customs with the far more dangerous idea of no customs whatsoever.) Kumalo complains that fear rules the land, but he does not offer a plan for alleviating this fear. The ideas Kumalo advances amount to little more than harsh words and complaints, rather than constructive plans or even short-term suggestions for progress.

By contrast, Dubula stands for hope, cooperation, and a pragmatic approach to social change. Whereas Kumalo can only stew over the poor housing opportunities afforded to black citizens, Dubula initiates a Shanty Town, in which formerly crowded tenants can spread out and await the chimney pipes and iron that Dubula courageously provides. Whereas Kumalo merely rants about the economic plight of black citizens, Dubula proposes and carries out a bus boycott to lower the fares for black passengers—a boycott that has the added effect of changing white citizens from the unified, faceless enemy that Kumalo describes into allies in the struggle for racial justice, as many whites offer car rides to blacks during the boycott, risking courtroom trials of their own. Whereas Kumalo is merely an eloquent “voice,” Dubula is a strong, tireless “heart” that refuses to acknowledge “the fear that rules [Kumalo’s] land.” Dubula rejects a career of complaining in favor of brave, practical, and loving efforts to improve the status of South Africa’s black citizens.

By moving past the superficial similarities between Kumalo and Dubula, Paton implies that a spirit of pragmatism and productivity is far more effective than stirring up rage and making speeches. At first, Dubula and Kumalo seem to be one and the same in their desire for racial equality, reinforcing the notion that civil rights movements tend to involve large, unified fronts. But Kumalo quickly distinguishes himself from Dubula in his unwillingness to put aside grievances and work for tangible change. Dubula, on the other hand, emerges as a hero, energetic and optimistic enough to drive blacks out of their cramped housing and into a makeshift Shanty Town. The genius and audacity of Dubula’s actions may account for Mshingulu’s glowing admiration: Unlike Kumalo, Dubula laughs away “the fear that rules this land.

.... I don’t know hope this helped
7 0
3 years ago
Who is bored -_- lets cha.t
saveliy_v [14]
Hey what’s sup how you doing
6 0
3 years ago
Which one is main idea
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

Explanation:

A.

4 0
2 years ago
According to FDR, does it seem that happiness is attainable without democracy?
ehidna [41]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

FDR explains that it's best to be happy with what you have, as well as the little things in life. "Joy and hope spring eternal despite harsh living conditions, thanks to American civil liberties."

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name 3 reasons why many Americans wanted to go to war with Great Britain in early 1812.
    5·1 answer
  • What idea is emphasized through repetition?
    14·1 answer
  • “On the Gulls' Road.” Which of the following is a theme of the story? A. The dead will be forgotten. B. People can never escape
    9·1 answer
  • Describe what a verb is in your own words
    13·2 answers
  • Lucy asked, "If they're isn't enough room for us in there limo, than whose going to take us?
    7·2 answers
  • Juan is creating notes of information he found so far .which step of research process is he on .
    7·2 answers
  • How has max helped freak? In freak the mighty
    14·1 answer
  • What does the narrator really want from her husband?
    9·1 answer
  • Why does Phillip think that Timothy is trying to get him to be independent of Timothy?
    10·1 answer
  • Which type of relationship is shown in the passa
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!