Cite other cases that came to similar conclusions.
Answer: fuel is low and I’m guessing the alternate is overheated
Explanation:
What is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd?a. Implicit themesb. Stage directions c. A resolution to the conflictd. Internal conflict
<u>Answer:</u>
A resolution to the conflict is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd.
c. A resolution to the conflict
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Theater of the Absurd assaults the agreeable convictions of strict or political conventionality. A type of dramatization that accentuates the foolishness of human presence by utilizing incoherent, monotonous, and unimportant exchange, purposeless and confounding circumstances, and plots that need practical or intelligent improvement.
Theater of the Absurd, emotional works of certain European and American producers of the 1950s and mid '60s who concurred with the Existentialist savant Albert Camus' appraisal, in his article "The Myth of Sisyphus" (1942), that the human circumstance is basically preposterous, without reason. So a goals to the contention isn't commonly present in works of the venue of the ludicrous.
Answer:
A cruel prince may be better for his subjects in the long run.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best summarizes the passage because the author describes a context in which an acceptable amount of cruelty is desirable. According to the author, this is the case when a Prince utilizes cruelty to punish a subject who has broken the law or violated the norms of the justice system.
By enforcing the law with a heavy hand, future disorders and calamities can be avoided that would be far worse for the people in general. In the case of the cruel execution of a criminal, few people would protest the measure.
