Answer:
Please consider the explanation below
Explanation:
a.Optimal order quantity per order = √2CO / I
= √[2*1500Units*625 ]/ (130)
=√1875000/130
=120 units per order
b.Minimum total annual inventory costs
Annually orders = 1500 / 120
= 12.5 times
Ordering cost = 12.5*625 = $7812
carrying cost = 120 units *$130 = $15600
Total annual inventory cost = $23412
c.The number of orders per year
= Annual denand / Optimum oder
= 15000 U / 120
= 12.5 times
• d.The time between orders (in working days)
= 364 / 12.5 (considered one leave)
= 29.12 days
=29 days
Answer:
If discount rate is 11.7% Project B should be accepted.
If discount rate is 13.5% both projects should be rejected
Explanation:
If the Net present value of Project A is higher than that of project B, we will accept project A and vice versa.
<u>Under 11.7% Discount Rate</u>
Net Present Value-Project A = -82000 + 34000 / 1.117 + 34000 / 1.117² + 34000 / 1.117³ = $85.099
Net Present Value-Project B = -82000 + 115000 / 1.117³ = $516.029
Project B should be accepted as it has a higher NPV.
<u />
<u>Under 13.5% Discount Rate</u>
Net present Value-Project A = -82000 + 34000 / 1.135 + 34000 / 1.135² + 34000 / 1.135³ = - $2397.49
Net Present Value-Project B = -82000 + 115000 / 1.135³ = - $3347.91
Both projects should be rejected as both have negative NPVs
Answer:
Given that,
Taxable income = $75,000
Interest from an investment = $10,000
Using the U.S tax rate schedule in 2017
(a) Federal tax will he owe = $5,226.25 + 25% × ($75,000 - $37,950)
= $5,226.25 + $9262.5
= $14,488.75
(b) 
= 19.32%.
(c)
= 17.05%
(d) Chuck is currently in the 25 percent tax rate bracket.
His marginal tax rate on increases in income up to $16,900 and deductions from income up to $37,050 is 25 percent.
Hey there,
Your question states: <span>Which of the following best explains why zoos are not affected by the threat of new entrants?
Based on the option's above, I feel like the answer would be (</span><span>Starting a zoo has a high entry cost.) Because by doing this, this could make to (zoo) in better quality. So when things go down like (a cage) for example, they could easily pay it back with all the extra money they have.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen</span>
Answer: Law of diminishing marginal utility
Explanation: In simple words, law of diminishing marginal utility states that as a consumer consume more of a good or service then the marginal benefit he or she receives from the additional consumption keeps on decreasing.
In the given case, Jenny's excitement keeps on decreasing with every chocolate she receives after a certain point of time.
Hence we can conclude that the given case illustrates law of diminishing marginal utility.
