Answer:
D. Will the Jury award be worth it?
Explanation:
Jones asking himself if whistle blowing is the only way to stop unethical behavior and wrong doing before making decision whether or not to whistleblow is important, as if there are alternative measures to be taken that would mitigate those actions, it might be better to take those alternatives.
Same thing with whether he has documentary evidence to back up his accusatory statements and the reason for whistleblowing.
But the one thing that shouldn't have bearing on his decision is if the Jury award would be worth it. Whether or not there's an award for whistleblowing shouldn't be the determinant or driving factor that decides whether or not he should whistleblow. Its unethical to consider the monetary aspect or award gotten from whistleblowing.
Answer:
omg that would be awesome tbh
Answer:
Investment Spending or Capital Expenditure.
Explanation:
Capital Expenditure or Investment Spending mainly deals with business expenditure on capital goods or factor/inputs of production which are used in the production process.
Answer:
B is the correct option.
Explanation:
In theory, the perfect market is the structure in which all the firms sell identical products,They all are price takers, the market share doesn't influence the prices, firms can enter or exit the market without cost and resources are perfectly mobile. No markets are in the sphere of the perfect competition model. so they are classified as imperfect. The imperfect and perfect market is the outcome of post-classical economic thought of the Cambridge tradition.
