The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
How would you describe the relationship between civilization and the state?
The relationship between civilization and the state is that when a civilization starts to develop more complex relationships and institutions, they need some structure and regulations to maintain harmony between the inhabitants that form a society.
Humans start to form groups and associations and problems arise. Personal interests and agendas strat to impose criteria, and most of the times only the strong survive,
How might the state help carry out a civilizing mission?
That is why humans go beyond and decide to form stronger forms for social and political institutions that had become forms of government that had evolved through the pass of time. This form of government bases its legitimacy on a Constitution or similar type of laws and regulations that establish law and order and guarantees people's rights and a way of living.
While you didn't really provide the "following" as the comment above me states, in general, the advantage of secondary sources of primary ones is that they perhaps provide a more objective or even just a broader view on a certain topic. While a primary source of the American civil war would be a letter written by a soldier, a secondary source would be a book that describes more letters taken together and discusses possible information regarding them.
They didn't want a strong central government so they apposed the convention.
Answer:
1. State Rights VS Federal Rights
2. Slavery
3. Economy
Explanation:
1. The Southern States wanted to be able to nuttify federal acts.
2. Slavery was given during the Southern States which didn't allow the black people to be free.
3. The southern economy depended on cotton and consequently, on slave labor.
I'm sorry I just really need some points :(
