All categories

3 years ago

What explains the political difference among African Americans politicians during reconstruction

History

2 answers:

love history [14]3 years ago

6 0

They had varied economic pasts. - Apex.

natka813 [3]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is that African American politicians had varied economic pasts.

<em>During the Reconstruction, the political difference among African American politicians was that they had varied economic pasts. </em>

Many African Americans had active participation and play key roles in politics during the Reconstruction period. The black people from the South were looking for <em>equal opportunities and the respect of their civil rights</em>. But one aspect that characterized this period was the differences among black leaders due to their varied economic pasts.

You might be interested in

Checks and balances affect which branch of the government

Stella [2.4K]

It affects all three branches of one of the branches doesn’t agree with the bill they will keep changing it. I hope this helps, I did not understand this.

4 0

3 years ago

How do you think you can apply group work in class to the business and professional world?

MariettaO [177]

Nsnsnd. skdkdkd . kelekdf

5 0

3 years ago

How were those of the<br> Mongol Empire taught to<br> ride a horse?

ale4655 [162]

To train a horse in the Mongol Empire, the rider would first get on the horse and let it run till it tires out.

<h3>Why were horses so important to the Mongols?</h3>

The Mongols believed that horses were sacred and so cared for them as best they could.

The way the horse was trained was that a rider would get on the horse and allow the horse to run until it got tired. They will then train the horse to get used to the commands of the reins.

Find out more on Mongols and their horses at brainly.com/question/12298570.

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

Which continent is the least densely populated?

murzikaleks [220]

1. Australia

Currently, Australia only has around 3 people per kilometer square which make it the second least densely populated continent in the world. (The first one is Antarctica)

Largest portion of Australian land was left as an authentic wild life environment, which is considered to be the most appealing things to promote Australian tourism sector.

2. higher birth rates

Population would be considered as 'growing' if the amount of birthrates outnumbered the amount of mortality rate each years.

As Africa's economy grow, there would be more people that able to sustain the life of their families. This would lead to an increase in birthrates and number of people who managed to survive and grow into adulthood.

3. By 2100, Africa’s population will reach the level of Asia’s population in 2010.

Even though Africa populations shows a positive growth over the past decades, Asian countries already achieved their industrialized status way before African population. Which means that it is very unlikely the African population would surpass Asian population.

4. Refugees

Refugees mostly decided to move out to other country to seek protection because their life is somehow threatened in their home country.

This would most likely caused by things such as economic instability, cruel government regime, ongoing conflict between different groups, etc.

It is not uncommon for refugees to be seen as nuisance by the people from their country destination due to the different in background, cultures and language.

5. -lack of educational opportunities

-discrimination

-low standard of living

Push factor refers to the negative characteristic that felt by people in a certain area, which influenced them to move out. This could include wide variety of reasons, including things such as poor economic condition, dangerous conflicts, lack of job and educational opportunities, etc.

6. safety and security

Pull factor refers to a positive characteristic that a certain area has that make it desirable for people outside the area to move in. Political pull factors refers to the pull factors that is controlled by the government. From the options, only safety and security fit the criteria since the government could utilize it's police department or military to achieve it.

6 0

3 years ago

Some historians have argued that the American Revolution was not revolutionary in nature. Instead of fostering revolutionary cha

djyliett [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Some historians have argued that the American Revolution was not revolutionary in nature. Instead of fostering revolutionary change, it maintained continuity.

I think that the American Revolution was a genuine revolutionary movement stemmed from the anger and desperation of the American colonists that suffered many grievances from the British government.

The 13 American colonies had to pay heavy taxation such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Acts, the Tea Act. The worst part was that Colonists did not have any voice or representation in the English Parliament.

That is why colonists created secret groups such as the Sons of Liberty and people like Samuel Adams united other colonists against the English crown.

It is true that there were also some particular agendas inside the revolutionary movement, specifically, economic ones. But in essence, for me, it was a true independence movement.

5 0

3 years ago