Kublai Khan is known and revered for his civilian and
administrative, not his military achievements. Grandson of Genghis Khan,
Kublai sought to govern rather than to exploit and devastate the vast
domains bequeathed to him by two generations of Mongol conquests. He
made the transition from a nomadic conqueror from the steppes to
effective ruler of a sedentary society. Ironically, however, his reign
witnessed the Mongols’ most remarkable military success, the subjugation
of the Southern Sung dynasty of China, and simultaneously their
greatest military fiascos, the failed naval expeditions against Japan
and Java.
<span>
<span>
</span>
</span>
The study of earth, like map reading, locations on the map, countries, continents, seas/oceans/lakes, mountains/hills (best way I could explain it, sorry if it doesnt make sense)
The correct answer is - The government had not followed through with promises of help.
The conflict resulted because of treaty violations by the United States government, and also by late or unfair annuity payments by the Indian agents. Throughout the 1950's this led to starvation among the Dakota (Sioux) people, and they were very frustrated about it.
Officially, thee conflict started when few Dakota hunters killed few white settlers that were also hunting, and afterwards the Dakota decided that they should kick out the white settlers from their territory and it is estimated that they killed around 800 men, women, and children. The US government responded with military action, captured lot of Dakota warriors, and some of them executed by hanging.
The answer is the English Imperialist.
The Englishmen had a more efficient route to Asian
countries. They call this route as the Northeastern Route. They discovered the route around 1800’s that
they were able to utilized this route. Since then, they had used this route to
reach their destinations faster.
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.
