1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
11

What is the responsibility of government in newly independent nation's?​

History
2 answers:
Tasya [4]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The responsibility of the government is to handle state affairs, facilitate public jobs, education and health, and to provide justice for all.

The government is also responsible for responding to natural disasters and ensuring that food and medicine are safe, as well as managing the nation's immigration policies.

Diano4ka-milaya [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The newly independent sovereign States regard territory as a legal shield of their sovereignty. Territorial inviolability is of the utmost importance to them.

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps :)

You might be interested in
Why did western farmers send products over the Appalachian Mountains instead of down the Mississippi River?
valentinak56 [21]

Spain refused to let Americans ship products down the river to New Orleans, under Spain’s control.


6 0
4 years ago
In what ways did agriculture spread? where and why was it sometimes resisted?
rjkz [21]
Diffusion and Colonization/Migration of agricultural peoples
5 0
3 years ago
What Banned States From denying votes To African Americans?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Jim Crow laws

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Why was Andrew Jackson called Old Hickory?
Romashka [77]
He was called that because "he was as tough as an old hickory".
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jallianwala Bagh massacre was an incident which ignited both sorrow as well as passion for independence adding fuel to the India
Ugo [173]

Answer:

The Amritzar or Jallianwala Bagh massacre took place in Jallianwala Bagh – India on April 13, 1919. A short history of the events at that time indicates that Colonel Reginald Dyer during that day that was marking the New Year for the Sikhs, and due to the curfew prohibiting a group of 4 or more meeting in public, he ordered to open fire to the people gathered together at Jallianwala Bagh listening to a meeting taking place that may result in riots and protests and killing more than a thousand unarmed civilians.

I certainly agree this act was coward and a shame to the British Army. The action taken by colonel Dyer (The Butcher of Amritzar) is considered now a day’s an act of genocide, violating the basic principles of human rights, there was no honor and no values in killing civilians just because their right to meet publicly in disagreement with the British rule.  


3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Napoleon chagnon's visit to the yanomamö tribe, where he observed tribe members appearing naked in public, using hallucinogenic
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP :(
    5·1 answer
  • How did the western settlement affect native Americans ?
    8·2 answers
  • What right has become an important part of the American democracy ever since the complaint was written
    14·1 answer
  • Please Help Has anyone taking favs citizenship exam before and could help me study will get brainless and bunch of poits
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these groups was MOST admired by Andrew Jackson?
    9·1 answer
  • How did welfare erode society
    9·1 answer
  • What was the goal of trust-busting in the early 1900s?
    9·2 answers
  • How is the supply of oil something that links many countries?
    11·1 answer
  • Ohio's population increased by nearly
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!