I'm sorry, but this question doesn't make any sense? Could you explain it a bit? You should also consider if this question fits in the subject English? Maybe better in math?
The injured man hobbled to the gate.
Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
The answer is C, it has 3 parts as opposed to 2. (compound)
Answer:
B. Evidence from a number of expert sources suggests that schools should design more nutritious lunch menus.
Explanation:
