Answer:
Criminal law cases are only conducted through the criminal court system. In contrast, civil laws deal with the private rights of individuals. Civil laws are applied when an individual has had his or her rights violated or when individuals have disputes with other individuals or organizations.
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is C. the U.S Constitution
EX
The U.S constitution is not to be confused with The declaration of independence with separated the united state from great Britain. this document employs a new and strong central government
Answer:
Realigning elections is a term from political science and political history that describes a dramatic change in the political system. Scholars frequently apply the term to American elections and occasionally to other countries. retrospective voting.
Explanation:
hope it helps
