Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? - the answer is arson
Answer:
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
paragraphs are in the Explanation
Explanation:
Option 1: They shouldn’t because that’s there property that got destroyed.
There could have been something that the land owners wanted to tare down because they wanted to build something new, that could benefit them.
Its there property that they bought with there money they should be able to build something on it.
It might benifit society and themselves so I believe yes.
_________________________________________________________
Option 2: They should because it could be used for the government in some way.
It was frequently damaged by nature so they must have been tired of see it being rebuilt and destroyed.
It could be benifical to the area around it.
It could save the land owner money to
sorry if it’s not to your likeing or if it took so long
Answer:
There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court in the United States.
Hope this helps!
Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.
<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>
Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.
Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.
So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.
Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909
