try using "Socratic" for your answer
Answer:
A: 2334 - 2215
Explanation:
The Akkadians were ancient group of people from the Semitic linguistic group. They started to thrive in Mesopotamia but not by war and overtaking the Summers., but instead they created a symbiosis. The Akkadians started to adopt lot of cultural traits from the Summers, while the Summers started to adopt the Akkadian language. The Akkadians quickly became dominant and after several military conquests they managed to control pretty much all of the valley of Tigris and Euphrates and its surroundings.
Answer: The correct answer is : b. served in the military and worked in war production.
Explanation: During the Second World War the government of the United States needed the help of the Navajo Indians. Given the need to create a secret military code that was not deciphered by the Japanese, the language of the Navajo Indians was used and code words were used since they did not have in their language many terms used in the war. 200 Navajo Indians were enlisted to act as key announcers.
<span>1 A large number of businesses are being formed on the island because of the nation’s commitment to a laissez-faire policy that stops it from hindering company growth.
</span><span>2 Because the car manufacturers are going broke, the government must step away from its laissez-faire strategy and bail out the businesses
</span><span>3 if the police adopted a laissez-faire attitude and allowed people to do whatever they wanted, the city would be in chaos.</span>
Answer:
Soft money
Explanation:
Soft money can be understood from the sobriquet, 'soft'. It is more or less a paper money. This is a well used fund in varying political circles. Thus, political parties can receive these funds and/or contributions from businesses and/or organization that are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
The implication of the non regulation by the Federal Election Commission is that there will be no limits as to the levels and degree of contributions that could be made.
The idea of soft money hinges on a fundamental human rights of free speech. As such, unnecessary influence is often eliminated in a bid to fulfil the rules that apply to such donations. The money are often made to political parties or individuals via direct or proxy routes.
