Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
Well id say they difffer in the fact that a dictionary is a book with pretty much every english word in it and democracy is a system of government
Some are more desirable because every person has a personal preference that appeals to them and if it isn't appealing to them or if society likes one more, it would naturally draw the to it.
The answer to your question is C.
Answer:
The first thing he saw when he reached the shore was a slave ship that was waiting for cargo. He was surprised until he was taken on board and treated as if he was a slave.