1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
3 years ago
10

Which of these is NOT a criticism of the concentric zone model?

History
2 answers:
Ganezh [65]3 years ago
7 0
The second one isn't criticism, it's just a fact.
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) It only applies to cities that grew after the development of the automobile.

The statement that is NOT a criticism of the concentric zone model is "It only applies to cities that grew after the development of the automobile."

In 1925, sociologist Ernest Burgess created the Concentric Zone Model to identify and explain urban social structures. He studied the case of the city of Chicago Illinois and developed a model of concentric rings. In the middle was the city's business center, then a factory zone followed by a transition zone. Then, a working zone, followed by a residential zone, and the last ring was a commuter zone.

You might be interested in
Explain ONE example of an imperial state that gained territory through a treaty settlement after World War I.​
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

The aftermath of World War I saw drastic political, cultural, economic, and social change across Eurasia, Africa, and even in areas outside those that were directly involved. Four empires collapsed due to the war, old countries were abolished, new ones were formed, boundaries were redrawn, international organizations were established, and many new and old ideologies took a firm hold in people's minds. World War I also had the effect of bringing political transformation to most of the principal parties involved in the conflict, transforming them into electoral democracies by bringing near-universal suffrage for the first time in history, as in Germany (1919 German federal election), Great Britain (1918 United Kingdom general election), and Turkey (1923 Turkish general election).[citation needed]

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the Napoleonic Code so revolutionary? Was it more of a step forward or a step back and why?
just olya [345]

Answer:

The Napoleonic Code made the authority of men over their families stronger, deprived women of any individual rights, and reduced the rights of illegitimate children. All male citizens were also granted equal rights under the law and the right to religious dissent, but colonial slavery was reintroduced.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph, explain why the feudal system was successful.
timurjin [86]
Feudal society<span> is a military hierarchy in which a ruler or lord offers mounted fighters a unit of land to control in exchange for a military service. The individual who accepted this land became the holder of the land, and the man who granted the land become known as his lord.


Hope this helps

</span>
7 0
3 years ago
why is the Hebrew insistence on monotheism an important turning point in the history of Mediterranean religions?
Phantasy [73]
Judaism was formerly a religion in which policies are about monotheism mostly and about Jews in context to law and morality. As centuries past by, Judaism has faced and influenced a lot of people throughout generations in the Hebrew people and this religion now became a lifestyle, most people in the old times had set specific occasion such as the Sabbath, the burning of incense and worship to YHWH. As this became the norm, the people also become in unison to the laws and doctrines of this religion that it has been a culture, the norm –not to kill, steal, worship other Gods, commit adultery, cannibalism and etc. Hope this helps.  <span> </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which which was the following would not be an issue supported by modern progressives?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

The answer is option D "Pro-choice on the issue of abortion"

Explanation:

Progressivism, in the US, political and social-change development that carried significant changes to American legislative issues and government during the initial twenty years of the twentieth century.

Progressivism reformers put forth the main exhaustive attempt inside the American setting to address the issues that emerged with the development of an advanced metropolitan and modern culture. The U.S. populace almost multiplied somewhere in the range of 1870 and 1900.

Urbanization and movement expanded at quick rates and were joined by a move from nearby limited scope assembling and business to huge scope industrial facility creation and monster public companies. Innovative forward leaps and furious looks for new business sectors and wellsprings of capital caused remarkable financial development.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pennsylvanja avoided conflict with native americans by
    15·1 answer
  • What did they call tobacco in the Virginia colony
    7·1 answer
  • Which is a key characteristic of totalitarian governments?
    15·1 answer
  • In the 1870s, when gold was discovered in the Blacks Hills, the federal government first tried to
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! i don’t want to fail!
    12·2 answers
  • How did opposition to this system affect the economy of the early republic?
    13·1 answer
  • How does South Carolina view the constitution
    13·1 answer
  • What was the greatest impact of social media on the revolution that followed the Iranian presidential election of 2009?
    13·2 answers
  • Why is it important that the party whips learn how many members will be present for a vote and how members are voting on a parti
    13·1 answer
  • Why did buddhism become popular in china? <br><br> PLEASE HELP!!!! NOW!!!! no links please!
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!