Answer:
The Arizona v. United States decision struck down all Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration.
Explanation:
Federalism is a form of government that stands in direct opposition to the notion of centralism, that is, to the form of political organization of states in which power appears centralized in the hands of a single governing group. Federalism, for its part, allows power (and the freedom to make decisions) to be distributed independently to the federal, state, and local government.
Under federalism, the rules governing immigration matters are different for the federal government, the state government, and the place where one can set their own guidelines for this. With regard to immigration, we can say that since the 1990s, states have increasingly adopted the political domain of immigration, and state involvement in immigration is partly due to their interest in preventing illegal immigrants from accessing public services, as educational and welfare benefits. In addition, we can state that federal immigration laws outperform state laws.
False information about immigration federalism is: "Arizona's decision against the United States overturned all of Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration."
Answer:
C. To ask gods questions about life
Explanation:
The correct option is 4
They stimulated the economy by increasing trade and creating a need for additional taverns and inns.
The Crusaders opened up the path for Europe to have a relationship with Asia.This led to development of international trade relations that led to the exchange of goods and ideas, and development of taverns and inns along the way.
President Adams paid tribute to the Barbary Pirates. In exchange for the tribute, the pirates would help protect U.S. Ships. This kept the pirates on our side and kept Britain and France from bothering us. Both were attacking our ships. Britain would also start to impress sailors (kidnap them and force them to work their ships).
By lowering the reserve requirements, banks are able to loan more money, which increases the overall supply of money. But, by raising the banks reserve requirements, the money supply could decrease. If banks are giving fewer loans in this title I would say their money has decreased. There is no sign of economic growth based on reading the quote, I think the best answer would be B.
