Answer:
Pacific, Atlantic, Indian, Arctic..I believe
Explanation:
Question:
Who was Daniel Shays?
Answer:
Daniel Shays was an American soldier, revolutionary and farmer famous for being one of the leaders and namesake of Shays' Rebellion, a populist uprising against controversial debt collection and tax policies in Massachusetts in 1786 and 1787.
Question:
What was Shays' Rebellion?
Answer:
Shays' Rebellion was an armed uprising in Western Massachusetts and Worcester in response to a debt crisis among the citizenry and in opposition to the state government's increased efforts to collect taxes both on individuals and their trades; the fight took place mostly in and around Springfield during 1786 and 1787.
Question:
How did Shays' Rebellion lead to the Constitutional Convention?
Answer:
Shays’ Rebellion was one of several critical events that led to the calling of a Constitutional Convention the following year in Philadelphia. Daniel Shays, a former Continental Army captain, led a group of <u>upset western Massachusetts residents who were upset about the way the state government was handling wartime debt and high taxes.</u>
<u />
Question:
What was the result of the Constitutional Convention?
Answer:
As history played out, the result of the Constitutional Convention was the United States Constitution, but it wasn't an easy path. The drafting process was grueling. They wanted the supreme law of the United States to be perfect.
The first two months of the Convention saw fierce debate over the 15 points of the "Virginia Plan" which had been proposed by Madison as an upgrade to the Articles of Confederation. Yet, the "Committee of the Whole" couldn't agree on anything. So, on July 24 of that year, the Committee of Detail was enacted to handle the drafting process.
The United States (U.S.) Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787 with 39 signatures before being distributed to the States for ratification.
<em>The Stamp Act of 1765.</em>
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was the tax that got put on the colonists by Great Britain, this made it so the colonists had to pay taxes on certain types of paper products, like newspapers.
This act was put on the colonists in 1765 and they did not agree with it at all. Many colonists were outraged by this and thought it was unfair that they were being taxed. They felt as if they had no say in what they were being taxed in and they had no colonists in British Parliament that could help plead their case, this is known as "taxation without representation." Great Britain said they needed the money from the colonists in order to pay for the French and Indian War, which was expensive, and they had British troops protecting the colonists. The colonists didn't agree with Great Britain and how they were trying to justify taxing them.
Over time, the colonists started to boycott the merchants and businesses that were selling goods that were stamped by the Stamp Act. They even went as far as threatening the merchants that were selling them and burning many goods. Great Britain realized that many British merchants and businesses were being harmed and essentially nobody was buying the stamped products. They ended up repealing the Stamp Act of 1765 after all of the outrage from the colonists.
Start it by saying have you ever thought about how much power the national government should have in elections.make that the hook then keep on going by saying your claim and opinion just keep going after you have your hook and put reasons on why that will be your introduction paragraph.then keep going by adding 2 or 3 body paragraphs hope this helped oh and don’t forget your conclusion you could say this all concludes the the reason why then put your opinion
