Answer: A. based on optimal plant size determination based on cost minimization
Explanation:
The information given isn't complete as there are some diagrams attached which I saw online.
Based on the information gotten, the decision on the price to charge and the quantity to produce in the long run will be based on optimal plant size determination based on cost minimization.
It should be noted that the quantity of goods produced in the long run, and the price that'll be charged will depends on optimal size of the plant. In the long, there can be an alteration of the plant size and therefore, the output and price will be determined by the optimal plant size.
We shall Ignore cost of sugar cane at $0.36 per pound, as its going to be incurred for both processes.
Lets find the cash flow from not processing further:
42500 pounds Sugar @ $1.43 per Pound $60,775
Lets find the cash flow from Processing Further:
If 42500 pounds of raw sugar are processed further, we get 34000 pounds of refined sugar(42500/1.25)
34000 pounds of refined [email protected] $2.23 per pound $75280
Additional Processing charges for 42500 [email protected]$0.49 ($20825)
Total Cash Flow $54995
As can be observed, the organisation earns more when they sell raw sugar, Thus sugar should not be processed further.
Oona should conduct research in the area of <u>"industrial-organizational" </u>psychology.
Industrial-organizational psychology is the branch of psychology that applies psychological speculations and standards to associations. Regularly alluded to as I-O brain research, this field centers around expanding working environment profitability and related issues, for example, the physical and mental prosperity of representatives.
Industrial-organizational psychologists use psychological standards and research strategies to take care of issues in the work environment and enhance the personal satisfaction. They think about work environment profitability and administration and representative working styles. They figure out the morale and identity of an organization or association.
Answer:
I would suggest he decrease the sales price.
Explanation:
Because it will might make people rush the product due to its low price compared to other products of another brand.
The low price will create a high demand for the product therefore causing the quantity of the products being produced to increase.
The quality of the product will be very good since the quality is not being reduced only the price therefore it might result in not having the maximum profit needed.
He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.
