According to the theory of the invisible hand, when there is competition, self-interested decisions advance the society interests.
<h3>What is the invisible hand theory?</h3>
Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher and economist, popularized the metaphor of the "invisible hand" to describe the processes by which positive social and economic consequences may result from the collective self-interested acts of individuals, none of whom intend to produce such outcomes.
<h3>How is Adam Smith's invisible hand idea still applicable today?</h3>
An important economic idea that is still relevant today is the invisible hand theory. It may provide insight into the operation of free markets and consumer behavior. Although the idea is significant, it is frequently applied in ways that are inconsistent with Smith's original text or out of context.
<h3>What exactly is the "invisible hand" and why is it significant?</h3>
The term "invisible hand" describes how an individual's self-interests help society as a whole. In other words, through pursuing the profit motive, individuals are required to offer commodities at a cost that others are prepared to pay. Society gains as a result since those goods might not have been created otherwise.
learn more about invisible hand theory here
<u>brainly.com/question/3078419</u>
#SPJ4
Answer: resistance to change
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that InSeason Inc. started a chain of organic supermarkets that had initial success and that the managers achieved a mastery of the firm's current environment, thereby filling a need in the market.
We are further told that InSeason defined and measured it success by financial metrics, with a focus on short-term performance and that as a result, the firm put in place metrics and systems to accommodate and manage increasing firm size due to continued success.
As a result of this tightly coupled system, InSeason developed a resistance to change. Resistance to change could be as a result of fear of failure by the company.
Answer: c. 78,000 equivalent units.
Explanation:
Equivalent units for conversion is calculated as:
= Units completed and transferred out + Equivalent ending work in process
Units completed and transferred out:
= Units started into production - Ending units
= 90,000 - 20,000
= 70,000 units
Equivalent ending work in process = 40% * 20,000 work in process units
= 8,000 units
Equivalent units for conversion = 70,000 + 8,000
= 78,000 units
Answer:
a. $3.13 per unit
b. No
c Yes
Explanation:
The computation is shown below
a. Fixed overhead per unit is
= Fixed overhead ÷ Number of units manufactured
= $363,000 ÷ 116,000 units
= $3.13 per unit
b. The cost calculation is not appropriate because the fixed overhead per unit is not be involved while calculating the cost
c. Now the acceptance of the offer should be based on total relevant cost which is
Total relevant cost
= $6.1 + $6.1 + $8.1
= $20.3
Since the offer is accepted because total relevant cost is less than the offered purchase price i.e $24.50
Answer:
$202,200
Explanation:
DINK (double-income no kids): It suggest to add half all the marriage debt to the funeral expenses:
To the funeral expenses you will add half of the debts:
350,000 / 2 = 175,000 for mortgage
18,600 / 2 = 9, 300 for atomobile loan
5,200 / 2 = 2,600 for credit card debt
9,800 / 2 = 4, 900 other debt
funeral exp <u> 10, 400 </u>
<em>insurance: 202,200</em>
