<span>The close ties between the church and the state in Massachusetts
did not help the government, but rather hurt the government. Although the Church
and the government had close ties with each other but still it was not right
for the church to have a say in the government. Church would always want the
members of their religion in the government and that would have a negative
impact on the government and people as a whole. General people’s ideas would
not find importance if the government was controlled by the church. </span>
The tensions over the slavery caused conflict in America primarily because of the different political views on the matter, as well as the economy.
The North wanted to modernize, and to follow the example of the European countries that abolished the slavery, thus they wanted the slaves to be freed, and to be equal citizens in the society. Also, the North was industrialized, so they were really not dependent on slaves to keep their economy going.
The South wanted things to remain the same. They did not wanted the slavery to be abolished, but instead to remain as it is. The economy of the south was largely based on the plantations with different types of crops. Big portion of the work done on the plantations was done by the slaves, so if they were freed, that would mean that the plantations would either be left without enough laborers, or the former slaves would have demanded wages that would lower the profit of the plantation owners.
This disagreements eventually led to a bloody conflict, which ended up with a win for the North.
In the unification of the Mediterranean world.
<span>C. the actions of Abdel Nasser that nationalized the Suez Canal in Egypt.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
A deepening and widening of networks of human interaction within and across regions contributed to cultural, technological, and. biological diffusion within and between various societies.
Improved commercial practices led to an increased volume of trade and expanded the geographical range of existing trade routes including the Silk Roads—promoting the growth of powerful new trading cities.
The growth of inter regional trade in luxury goods was encouraged by innovations in previously existing transportation and commercial technologies, including the caravansary, forms of credit, and the development of money economies.
Changes in trade networks resulted from and stimulated increasing productive capacity, with important implications for social and gender structures and environmental processes.
Demand for luxury goods increased in Afro-Eurasia. Chinese, Persian, and Indian artisans and merchants expanded their production of textiles and porcelains for export; manufacture of iron and steel expanded in China.