Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
Beau gets a $15,000 loan from a credit union to buy an automobile. Debt receives the assignment from the lender of the authority to accept loan payments. Beau can be sued by the assignee if he refuses to pay the loan.
A payment is the voluntarily made exchange of money, its equivalent, or other valuables by one party (such as an individual or business) for a loan another's goods, services, or to satisfy a legal obligation. Payer refers to the party sending the money, whereas payee denotes the recipient of the payment.
In principle, the payee is free to choose the payment method he or she will take; nevertheless, most payments regulations often compel the payer to accept the nation's legal cash up to a specified maximum. Except loan otherwise otherwise agreed by the parties, payments are typically made in the payee's native currency.
Learn more about payments here
brainly.com/question/15138283
#SPJ4
Based on the economic and financial analysis, the main reason for considering <u>nonconstant growth</u> in dividends is to allow for "<u>Supernormal</u>" growth rates over "<u>some finite length of time</u>."
This is because, in nonconstant growth, the growth rate cannot surpass the mandatory return indefinitely.
However, there is the probability that it could do so for some number of years.
Also, it should be noted that in this situation, the value of the stock equates to the present value of all the future dividends.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>supernormal</u> and <u>some finite length of time</u>.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13223703
Answer:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Raking 2% interest rate:
1) 10 years
2) 5 years
3) 1 year
Raking 18% interest rate:
1) 1 year
2) 5 years
3) 10 years
Explanation:
You have to apply to bring the amount of money to present value, according with the information, the formula is the next:
Present Value = Future Value/((1+ interest rate)^(n))
Where n is the number of years that you have to wait to receive the money.
You have to calculate every situation with the respective amount of time and interest rate, the result must be money. and when you get the 9 results, you have to compare every situation and chose the higher amount of money according to the interest rate, for example:
Present value = 140/ ((1+10%)^(1))= 127
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 149
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 135
So the answer for the first scenario with an interest rate of 10% is:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Potential GDP = $20
Real GDP =$19.2
so an output gap is measured relative to potential output and it is calculated according to the formula [( X - Y ) Ă· Y] Ă—100. In this case, the output gap is [($10 billion - $8 billion) Ă· $8 billion] Ă—100 = 25%.
