I don't believe in the American Dream, because if you look outside your window, there are so many people in broken down houses, most without a house. Sleeping in cars, sleeping on a friend's couch, homeless shelters, foster care. I believe it would be possible if the rich gave more to the poor. I think those who believe in it have their heart in the right place, but to be honest, there's nothing much they can do unless they convince the government to tax the rich higher taxes, and give the extra to the poor. It is foolish to believe America will ever be what the American Dream stands for. Honestly, when somebody has money, they don't want to give it to anybody else. Keep it themselves.
Hope this helps!
-Belle
Answer:
I can say as that the are leaders in their own learning.
Answer:
We all need clean water. Some countries all over the world have to drink dirty, impure water this is unhygienic and unhealthy and I think that everyone has the right to drinking good, healthy water.
Explanation:
"In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" both use the same event but they reveal completely different views of World War 1. In the first mentioned story author shows his respect to those who was fighting for their country and future generations, persuading the reader to feel the same and to be ready to protect their motherland. Author of the second story describes all the frightening moments of war and convinces the readers that it if they had to stand on the front line it would be the worst experience in their life. So, In Flanders Fields" eulogize war while "Dulce et Decorum Est!" warrns against it.
