Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
All of these represent features of evidence-based practice (EBP). It is now common for insurance companies to adjust the services they will pay for based on EBP guidelines.
Answer:
It suggests that they are not doing anything competitively different.
Explanation:
Network externalities if well harnessed should bring about an increase in end users satisfaction and value derived.
Multi housing costs, ordinarily, and when taken as a whole, should results to an overall minimization of the total costs. Economics of scales and other resources are centrally allocated here, and the effect should be a gain to the entity.
Level of differentiation across firm's offerings - products or services, signals the procedures an organization adopt to mark the uniqueness of their products or services. It shows how distant they are among the other varying sets.
Thus, from the case given, the four firms have the same share of the market - 25%. The implication is that as far as we are concerned, their level of activities and postures in the market is same and/or similar. This ultimately cuts across the network externalities, multi housing costs and the level of differentiation of firm's offerings. They are thus not competitively different.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Single overhead rate is
= total cost ÷ total labor hours
= ($48000 + $72000 ) ÷ (2600+2400)
= 24 per labour hour
Now
Dining chairs
= 2600 × 24
= $62400
And,
tables
= 2400 × 24
= $57600
total = $120000
Answer:
e. none of the above.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that your net profit per unit is none of the above. This is because since you are selling and the exercise price was set at $0.86 then the price lowering to 0.78 means that you sold at a much higher price than market value, which leads to about 0.08 profit per unit.
