Depends on your view, this is an opinion-based question, so there is no right or wrong answer.
Here is my opinion: I think that the U.S should have declared war to Mexico. First, I believe that Texas was a territory that belonged to the U.S, as Mexican General Antonio Lopez signed a treaty that gave the U.S the right to annex Texas. Furthermore, most people that lived in Texas wanted to be part of the United States. Like democracy given to those in the Kansas-Nebraska territory years later, to decide whether they should be a free state or a slave state, the people should decide what they want to do with their state.
Second, I hold the view that the war is rational because expansionism is done in peaceful ways, but Mexico refused to be peaceful and immediately resorted to war. President James Polk wanted to expand the U.S, but Mexico refused to give up Texas. Today, we have Texas as a result of this war.
I think it's A
Explanation:
the moon is what causes tides and with tides the water moves towards the moon. im not 100% sure. i hope this helps!
Monarchy- “A form of government with a monarch at the head.”
Dictatorship- “A country governed by a dictator.”
Oilgarchy- “A small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution.”
Totalitarian- “Relating to a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state.”
I know they aren’t 6 words but you can just take pieces of information from them.
Answer:
It depends on the test but the one i took said: a socialist who called for the overthrow of the capitalist system
Explanation:
What did war with Spain in Cuba have to do with the Philippines?
In it, Spain renounced all claim to Cuba, ceded Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States and transferred sovereignty over the Philippines to the United States for $20 million. ... The Philippine-American War began in February of 1899 and lasted until 1902.
Hoped that helped:)
