1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vaieri [72.5K]
3 years ago
9

Name the compromise that determined the future of slavery in the new states after 1820

History
1 answer:
Reil [10]3 years ago
3 0
It was the 
Missouri Compromise
You might be interested in
Industrial revolution bringing nationalism specific examples
kramer
You are going to have to search it up online to get your answer
4 0
3 years ago
Help, please!!!
Ksenya-84 [330]
I believe it was the Arab Oil Embargo, because during this time we weren’t receiving as much oil so the speed limit had to go down to 55mph to preserve what we did have.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of these was an effect of U.S. government policies during the 1920s? (5 points)
Gekata [30.6K]

The correct answer is B) US free trade increased.

An effect of US government policies during the 1920s was that US free trade increased.

The 1920s represented a time of great prosperity for the United States. Indeed, there is a term that identifies these years in America called "the Roaring 1920s." The US industry was running smoothly, people had money or credit, so they could buy many necessary or unnecessary things and this meant more income for the US companies. Those years were the beginning of Mass Culture.  

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Harriet Tubman is true?
Ahat [919]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

She led more than 300 slaves to freedom as a conductor on the Underground Railroad.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While visiting the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp shortly after World War II, one German civilian is said to have remarked, "W
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

The just-world phenomenon.

Explanation:

In psychology, the just-world phenomenon refers to a fallacy where someone assumes that something that happened to somebody else (whether good or bad) happened because they deserved it. In other words, this view stems from a misconception that the world is fair or just, and that everybody is just getting what's coming to them. This just-world theory is often used to rationalize any kind of heinous acts, such as torture, murder, genocide, etc., essentially blaming the victim. In this case, the horrors of the Holocaust were rationalized by the German civilian as something that its victims deserved. In that person's mind, a punishment of such magnitude had to be proportional to  the magnitude of the victims' crimes. This is an example of the just-world phenomenon.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the sentence from "How We Entered World War I."
    6·1 answer
  • . What sorts of markets are found in the world's global cities?
    10·1 answer
  • How was the principle of the Roosevelt Corollary different from that of the Monroe Doctrine?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the colonial governments of the Spanish and English colonies differ? A. Spanish colonies were controlled by the Spanish
    12·1 answer
  • What process allows citizens to directly propose laws?
    5·1 answer
  • What kind of source is a textbook
    13·2 answers
  • A major Renaissance work by Machiavelli was
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement is true?
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Kailan masasabing kontemporaryong isyu ang isang pangyayari? 1. Nagaganap sa kasalukuyang panahon lamang. II. Walang epekto s
    6·1 answer
  • Hitler used the "Stabbed in the Back” idea to gain followers. What did this idea express?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!