1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zysi [14]
3 years ago
11

Explain why early state structures were smaller and less integrated in Europe and the Central Andes than the territorial states

that arose elsewhere. How similar and different were the early state structures in Europe and the Central Andes?
History
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
3 0

<u>Answer:</u>

In Europe, the regions were mostly and vastly dominated by the abundant forest cover in the north and the west. Hence these areas have sparse population and have very slow pace to implement new ways. These areas also don’t have any fertile land that would help them to create a powerful kingdom. On the other hand, America has a different story. In this area there were not many animals that could carry loads. Hence the local communities produced only in limited amount and traded luxuries.

You might be interested in
A person who helps manage relations between countries is known as _____.
pickupchik [31]
The correct answer is actually a diplomat.  The secretary of state carries out foreign policies through the State Department and the Foreign service of the United States.  An executive is responsible for enforcing laws.  The president is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please hurry! What was life like in mongol society?
Shtirlitz [24]
The answer will depend on two things, where in Asia and when in Asian you're referring to. You have to remember that the Mongol Empire was the largest the world has ever seen, and stretched from parts of South Asia all the way into parts of Eastern Europe. Due to this, their society was different depending on where you found them. Often, the Mongols would begin to adopt parts of the society of the areas they occupied (i.e. The Mongols in the Middle East/Central Asia began to adopt Islam as their religion, and reflected it in their culture, while Mongols who occupied China would take on more Chinese ways of life.)

As for mongol society that didn't involve this "borrowing of culture," The Mongols were nomadic peoples that lived throughout Central and Northern Asia. They were originally series of many different tribes, but eventually became united under Ghangis Khan through his policies of marrying off his children to other tribes rulers, simple alliances, and sometimes force.

The Mongol Empire also brought a lot to Asia (some people see their Empire as having been a benefit to the whole of Asia, really). Since most of Asia was dominated by the one empire, trading became much easier, with trade routes becoming more secure. Besides the spread of goods through trade, they also helped to spread ideas for the same reason. Several countries connected together by one Empire allowed the Mongols to spread ideas throughout their empire. In modern day you can still find Influences of the Mongol Empire in Asia, such as the continued practice of Islam in Central Asian and Western China, or the fact that they had helped several cities develop more quickly, thus cementing their place in history.
8 0
3 years ago
How did Galileo's findings with the telescope disprove the Ptolemaic theory?
-Dominant- [34]
I think its A( I'm not completely sure though )
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the transfer of power after the election 1800 significant? It set the precedent that political parties would always chal
IgorC [24]

Considering the available options, the reason the transfer of power after the election 1800 was significant is that "<u>It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>

<h3>The United States Presidential Election of 1800</h3>

Following the Presidential election of 1800, the incumbent party, the Federalist Party, lost the election to the Democratic-Republican Party.

John Adams was the incumbent President that lost the election to Thomas Jefferson and yet calmly transferred power to the election winner.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a correct answer is an option. D. <u>"It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>

Learn more about US Election here: brainly.com/question/13474496

8 0
2 years ago
WHAT term refers to the role of the President as the head of all of the branches of the military.
galben [10]

commander in chief I think

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe japans feudal warrior system and identity how it was similar to that of medival Europe. Be sure to explore the role of
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to American Indians after 1492? They began growing tea and coffee. Most perished from disease. Their population de
    8·2 answers
  • Who did the populist of the late 1800's seem to line up with more? Why? Explain Hamilton vs. Jefferson
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP IM HAVING TROUBLE ON MY CHAPTER TEST!!! (time4learning)
    6·1 answer
  • How did trade and a desire for new markets let to american overseas Imperialism in the late 19th century
    14·1 answer
  • What challenge did Americans have after the war of independence?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a sharp projecting edge of something?  
    15·1 answer
  • In what way did the US military prepare African American soldiers for war?
    6·1 answer
  • What Enlightenment philosopher advocated for the abolishment of
    13·1 answer
  • Pls help i only have 13 points and its only three questions with the same options&lt;3
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!