To illustrate that the list that McCandless had made was supported by actions as well as words, as shown in option D.
<h3>What is the effect of this description?</h3>
- It increases the reader's feelings about the characters' intentions.
- It optimizes the understanding of McCandess' image.
- Characterizes the characters indirectly.
When Krakauer describes McCandless's image of himself, he promotes a greater understanding of McCandless's list and shows himself as a character who likes to analyze the actions of others very accurately. It also shows that McCandless is a very proactive character who speaks and acts on his words.
This attitude is efficient to explain the characters and indirectly characterizes them.
Learn more about indirect characterization:
brainly.com/question/12003614
#SPJ1
Answer:
I think it'd be answer D. But both C and D look like tragedies to me lol, but if I had to pick between the two I'd say D.
Answer:
The central conflict is introduced in act 1, built up in act 2 and resolved in act 3.