1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
3 years ago
10

In a paragraph, analyze the Great Comprise during the Constitutional Convention. What problem did it solve? What were the altern

atives
History
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Hello!  

To have the option to viably address this inquiry you should initially comprehend what the initial two plans were.  

The Virginia Plan was an arrangement that would support bigger states in the administrative branch. It successfully based portrayal in those branches exclusively off of populace, which would seriously prevent littler states portrayal in Congress. This framework would likewise be a unicameral house; a solitary house framework.  

The New Jersey Plan was an arrangement that would level out the contrasts between the littler states and bigger states by giving that everyone have an equivalent measure of agents in Congress. Thusly, each state, paying little mind to populace, would have a specific measure of administrators from their state. This framework was additionally a unicameral house; a solitary house framework.  

These two plans share a reasonable similarity to the current framework we have today. This framework, likewise called the Connecticut Compromise by those at the Convention, was a trade off that consolidated the significant parts of the two plans. It utilized a bicameral house; a house framework with two separate houses. One house, the Senate, would be based off the New Jersey design and have equivalent portrayal for all. The other house, the House of Representatives, would be based off the Virginia Plan and give the quantity of agents to each state dependent on populace.  

Fun reality: Every 10 years the government decides what number of seats a state gets in the House through the US registration.

You might be interested in
True or false the supremacy clause states that the us constitution is the highest word on the law
kotykmax [81]

Answer:  TRUE

The Supremacy Clause ensures the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the foundation of government.  The Supremacy Clause in the Constitution of the United States establishes that the Constitution is above any state law enacted or other law that is passed.  Any other laws and government actions must be in accordance with the nation's Constitution.  The Supremacy Clause is the second clause of Article VI of the Constitution.  It is stated as follows:

  • <em>This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Teddy Roosevelt legacy included
nlexa [21]
I need a QUESTION you cant just put 4 words here and expect us to know what your talking about
3 0
3 years ago
1. Where did the ideas for changes to the Constitution come from? What kinds of changes were being suggested?
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

1.When the Constitution was being written, the men writing the document realized it might have to be altered in the future.  Since the document was written in a general format, the delegates realized that as time changed, it might be necessary to change the Constitution.  However, the delegates believed that it should be more difficult to change the Constitution than to change a law.  Thus, they required two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the state governments to agree to change it.

2.James Madison Drafts Amendments

In September 1789 the House and Senate accepted a conference report laying out the language of proposed amendments to the Constitution. Within six months of the time the amendments–the Bill of Rights–had been submitted to the states, nine had ratified them.

3.The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states.

4.On September 25, 1789, Congress transmitted to the state Legislatures twelve proposed amendments to the Constitution. Numbers three through twelve were adopted by the states to become the United States (U.S.) Bill of Rights, effective December 15, 1791.

5.Understandably, any people that fought a revolution over "TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION" would be cautious about the new Constitution created in 1787. For example, famous Virginian Patrick Henry refused to attend the Convention because he "smelt a rat."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who attacked Poland from Asia?
s344n2d4d5 [400]
Tartars from Mongolia
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
That would not have gotten the point across to the government. We needed a body count to make our point. Timothy McVeigh, on why
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

b. McVeigh was a domestic terrorist who had expressed hatred for the U.S. government and the military.

Explanation:

The bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma on April 19, 1995, was a domestic terror attack by a right-wing terrorist Timothy McVeigh and his co-conspirator Terry Nichols, both ex-military. The idea was a result of McVeigh's discontent with the U.S. government about its foreign policy and its dealing with the 1992 Ruby Ridge incident and the 1993 siege of the religious sect's Branch Dravidians' compound in Texas.

More famously known as the Oklahoma City Bombing, the attack by McVeigh led to the deaths of more than a hundred people including children and more injured. He used a rental truck filled with explosives, parked it on the northern side of the building and the blast took out most of the north side of the whole building. And the most gruesome part of the bombing was that he detonated the bomb just when the day's business was starting, meaning that he had intended to hurt and kill as many lives as he can, justified by his statement <em>"We needed a body count to make our point"</em> and the intention of not attacking at night because <em>"there would be fewer people inside." </em>

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did Burke most likely agree or disagree with the radical course of the French Revolution? How can you tell?
    14·1 answer
  • What are some of the laws places on the colonies by the British government?
    11·1 answer
  • The framers of the constitution believed that they created a government
    9·1 answer
  • How do we past the STAAR
    7·1 answer
  • As a result of the great awakening, the congressions of some established churches in the colonies divided into
    7·1 answer
  • Why was Jefferson so frightened about the Missouri compromise
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Louisiana colonists dislike Ulloa?
    7·2 answers
  • 1st answer will get brilints
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Gandhi stop wearing suits and ties​
    6·1 answer
  • Overall do conditions appear to be improving or getting worse? What Important qualifications must be made to any generalizations
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!