1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodomira [7]
2 years ago
5

I need help with history, anyone helpful for it?

History
1 answer:
Kruka [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes i can help you with your history

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When blacks moved from the southern states to the Northern states in the early part of the 20th century, a push factor was
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Economic exploitation, social terror and political disenfranchisement were the push factors. The political push factors being Jim Crow, and in particular, disenfranchisement. Black people lost the ability to vote.

3 0
3 years ago
Other than a broken culture, what were the other long term effects of the scramble for Africa?
Fed [463]

Answer:

This columns shows that partitioned ethnic groups have suffered significantly longer and more devastating civil wars. It also uncovers substantial spillovers as ethnic conflict spreads from the historical homeland of groups partitioned to nearby areas where non-split ethnicities reside

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was happening in russia in the 1800s?
mestny [16]

Russia fought the Crimean War (1853-56) with Europe's largest standing army, and Russia's population was greater than that of France and Britain combined, but it failed to defend its territory, the Crimea, from attack. This failure shocked the Russians and demonstrated to them the inadequacy of their weaponry and transport and their economic backwardness relative to the British and French.

Being unable to defend his realm from foreign attack was a great humiliation for Tsar Nicholas I, who died in 1855 toward the end of the war. He was succeeded that year by his eldest son, Alexander II, who feared arousing the Russian people by an inglorious end to the war. But the best he could do was a humiliating treaty, the Treaty of Paris – signed on March 30, 1856. The treaty forbade Russian naval bases or warships on the Black Sea, leaving the Russians without protection from pirates along its 1,000 miles of Black Sea coastline, and leaving unprotected merchant ships that had to pass through the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits. The treaty removed Russia's claim of protection of Orthodox Christians within the Ottoman Empire, and it allowed the Turks to make the Bosporus a naval arsenal and a place where the fleets of Russia's enemies could assemble to intimidate Russia.

In his manifesto announcing the end of the war, Alexander II promised the Russian people reform, and his message was widely welcomed. Those in Russia who read books were eager for reform, some of them with a Hegelian confidence in historical development. These readers were more nationalistic than Russia's intellectuals had been in the early years of the century. Devotion to the French language and to literature from Britain and Germany had declined since then. The Russians had been developing their own literature, with authors such as Aleksandr Pushkin (1799-1837), Nicolai Gogol (1809-62), Ivan Turgenev (1818-83) and Feodor Dostoievski (1821-81). And Russian literature had been producing a greater recognition of serfs as human beings.

In addition to a more productive economy, many intellectuals hoped for more of a rule of law and for an advance in rights and obligations for everyone – a continuation of autocracy but less arbitrary. From these intellectuals came an appeal for freer universities, colleges and schools and a greater freedom of the press. "It is not light which is dangerous, but darkness," wrote Russia's official historian, Mikhail Pogodin.

And on the minds of reformers was the abolition of serfdom. In Russia were more the 22 million serfs, compared to 4 million slaves in the United States. They were around 44 percent of Russia's population, and described as slaves. They were the property of a little over 100,000 land owning lords (pomeshchiki). Some were owned by religious foundations, and some by the tsar (state peasants). Some labored for people other than their lords, but they had to make regular payments to their lord, with some of the more wealthy lords owning enough serfs to make a living from these payments.

Russia's peasants had become serfs following the devastation from war with the Tartars in the 1200s, when homeless peasants settled on the land owned by the wealthy. By the 1500s these peasants had come under the complete domination of the landowners, and in the 1600s, those peasants working the lord's land or working in the lord's house had become bound to the lords by law, the landowners having the right to sell them as individuals or families. And sexual exploitation of female serfs had become common.

It was the landowner who chose which of his serfs would serve in Russia's military – a twenty-five-year obligation. In the first half of the 1800s, serf uprisings in the hundreds had occurred, and serfs in great number had been running away from their lords. But in contrast to slavery in the United States, virtually no one in Russia was defending serfdom ideologically. There was to be no racial divide or Biblical quotation to argue about. Those who owned serfs defended that ownership merely as selfish interest. Public opinion overwhelmingly favored emancipation, many believing that freeing the serfs would help Russia advance economically to the level at least of Britain or France. Those opposed to emancipation were isolated – among them the tsar's wife and mother, who feared freedom for so many would not be good for Russia.

3 0
2 years ago
Discuss the Lusitannia incident and its impact?
harina [27]

Hi,

The Lusitania was sunk in 1915 and the US did not enter the war until almost two years after the sinking. The sinking of the Lusitania and the American reaction to that sinking caused the Germans to temporarily halt their policy of unlimited submarine warfare.

Side note: Found the answer with this link :)

https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-impact-did-sinking-lusitania-have-what-came-418703

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following reasons is the best possible explanation for the changes in Europe's population since 1750?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
<span>An increase in scientific and medical discoveries improved life expectancies.

</span>The best possible explanation for the changes in Europe's population since 1750 is that an increase in scientific and medical discoveries improved life expectancies.In fact, it was around this type that basic hygiene norms were implemented, as well as some mortal diseases were cured or  to improve lifbetter treated. Moreover, the discovery of vaccinations helped greatly to improve life expectancies.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the characteristics of a revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the battle of fance impact the outcome of war?
    11·2 answers
  • What were the problems with the crittenden compromise plan?
    15·1 answer
  • Who were the first Europeans to come to Canada but did not stay
    11·2 answers
  • What happened when the forts in New Mexico were abandoned during the Civil War?
    6·1 answer
  • All mankind ... being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm
    13·1 answer
  • Which portion of the Fourteenth Amendment deals with citizenship?
    13·1 answer
  • A church was one of the first buildings built in a new village.
    11·2 answers
  • Who was the Frist King of Saudi Arabia
    6·2 answers
  • Where did magellan died and who killed magellan
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!