1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
daser333 [38]
3 years ago
9

True or false The latifundia system is considered an obstacle to development in Latin America

Social Studies
2 answers:
Tamiku [17]3 years ago
8 0

True or false The latifundia system is considered an obstacle to development in Latin America

Your answer for this is true.

Leokris [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

  • The latifundia are considered as an extensive part of privately owned lands and are specialized in the agricultural exports of the olive, grapes, and wine and during the colonial period, the Europeans often used industrialization agriculture along with the dependence on economic slavery.
  • <u>Latifundia started to grow as economic consolidation as the larger estates attained greater economies of scale and senators did not pay takes and land revenues and thus small farms had lower productivity and could not compete. </u>
You might be interested in
Learning by observing and imitating others is called
jeka57 [31]
Observational learning? (it also depends on what you're learning)
6 0
2 years ago
Why do natural resources make difference in communities ?
Ierofanga [76]
Because, biscuit biscuit biscuit nom nom
5 0
3 years ago
Which issue did the Land Ordinance of 1785 address?
andreev551 [17]

Answer: The Land Ordinance of 1785 addressed the issue of how to divide the western lands acquired by the United States in the Treaty of Paris.

Explanation: The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785. It set up a standardized system whereby settlers could purchase title to farmland in the undeveloped west. ... The 1785 ordinance laid the foundations of land policy until passage of the Homestead Act of 1862.

Hope this helps^^

3 0
4 years ago
why did framers of the constitution create the legislative branch with a bicameral structure ? ( essay… )
Pie

The founders established Congress as a bicameral legislature as a check against tyranny. They feared having any one governmental body become too strong. This bicameral system distributes power within two houses that check and balance one another rather than concentrating authority in a single body. The House of Representatives is the larger body with membership based on each state’s population. The Senate is the smaller body with each state having two delegates. With one hundred members, the Senate is a more intimate, less formal legislative body than the House, which has 435 members elected from districts that are roughly the same size in population.

Members of Congress must reside in the district or state that elects them, although the Constitution does not specify for how long. Residency can become a campaign issue, as it did when former first lady and current secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, ran for a Senate seat from New York soon after leaving the White House, despite having never lived in the state. She was successful despite having to fend off criticism that as a carpetbagger she was not suited to represent New York’s interests in Congress. The term “carpetbagger” refers to a politician who runs for office from an area where he or she has lived for only a short time and has few community ties. It derives from a derogatory term coined after the Civil War referring to Northerners who went south to profit from the Reconstruction, carrying “carpet bags” for luggage. Members of Congress are elected locally to serve nationally. All aspects of members’ jobs, whether it be making laws or providing service to people in their home districts, are influenced by this dual concern with representing local constituencies while dealing with national policy.

7 0
3 years ago
George would like to be financially protected from unexpected malfunctions and maintenance costs associated with his new dishwas
nalin [4]
The answer would be : cost of the policy exceeds george's perceived benefit.

According to George's point of view, paying $50 of insurance per month may even be more than the cost of a new dishwasher itself

hope thsi helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the patricians kept the plebeians happy?
    13·1 answer
  • Alfest Bank has a database of the registered mobile numbers of its higher-value customers. When these customers make calls to th
    15·2 answers
  • Francisco came to the U.S. on a swimming scholarship. After a few months of frustration with trying to find the swim goggles he
    13·1 answer
  • Hey can anyone pls pls pls help me in dis I will mark u as brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Emperor Wendi of China do to help his people ????
    5·1 answer
  • Why do people feel the need to change who they are to make strangers like them? I know this won't change anything, but if you fe
    13·1 answer
  • Running and sleep. Sufficient sleep is important for adolescents for both their neural and psychological development. Despite th
    13·1 answer
  • Differences between panchayat and multi party systems ?
    13·1 answer
  • Hurry please make a summary of the Reconstruction 1865 - 1877 and add additional notes too please
    13·1 answer
  • How many windows can be open simultaneously using the quickbooks online advanced desktop app?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!