Answer is A because, the exposition is telling what the story starts & what will cause the climax to rise
Answer:
They form the argument’s main point.
Explanation:
In a written argument reasons and evidence form the argument's main point. There has to be an explanation that is backed by actual evidence for that argument existing in the first place, otherwise the entire argument is made mute. The involved characters in the argument usually go to certain lengths to win/resolve the argument but if the entire argument is not backed by reasons and evidence then it opens up huge plot holes as the characters are making all their choices for no actual reason.
5 iambs or 5 sections (though i’d stick with iambs :D)
"<span>But like a hawk encumber'd with his hood, Explaining Metaphysics to the nation-- I wish he would explain his Explanation.</span>" > criticizes the subject for confusing his audience
"…he really promised something great, If not intelligible, without Greek Contrived to talk about the Gods of late, Much as they might have been supposed to speak. " > criticizes the subject for his half baked knowledge
"He was a mighty poet—and A subtle-souled Psychologist; All things he seemed to understand Of old or new—of sea or land— But his own mind—which was a mist." > Criticizes the subject for having abundant knowledge of the world but low self-awareness
