A. It protected the rights of only the poor.
B. It issued funds for affordable housing based on race and
gender.
(√) C. It
violated a federal law regarding fair housing practices.
D. It promoted equality among all people except the poor.
Answer:
i cant give you an answer because there is not enough info to give an answer
Explanation:
The third option is correct so make sure to mark me branliest.
Answer:
because no plans, sanitary codes, or building regulations controlled the rampant growth of English cities, the poor lacked adequate housing and many were forced to live in dark, filthy, overcrowded slums under unhealthy and unsafe conditions
negative:
overpopulation
debt increase
high taxes
workhouses: conditions were bad
inadequate housing: no plans/sanitary codes/building regulation
positive:
more jobs
closer to jobs
workhouses: since govt wanted to make sure people feared workhouses, families were split, poor wore uniforms, everyone had to work, etc.