Although Hamlet indicates to the reader that he is not mad, the characters in the play believe that he is. Match the character to his or her reason given for Hamlet's "madness."
1. the death of Hamlet's father
2. the death of Hamlet's father and the ensuing hasty marriage
3. Ophelia's rejection of Hamlet's love
4. disappointment at not being named king after his father's death
Polonius
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
Claudius
Gertrude
Jaggers calls Wemmick the most cunning imposter in all of London because <em>Jaggers disagrees with what Pip said</em> that Wemmick is a kind-hearted person. Because the <em>Wemmick that Jaggers knew is different from what Pip described him to be.</em> The Wemmick that Jaggers knew is different. The Wemmick that he knew can often be such a calculating individual in his business dealings. That is why Jaggers jokingly referred to him as the most cunning imposter in all of London.
Answer: The denouement of the story "The adventure of the cardboard box" is the confession by Jim why he murdered Mary and her male companion also.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The story "The adventure of the cardboard box" is a mystery and to solve this mystery Sherlock was called. In the story, Mary and her male companion whose name was Alec Fairbarn were murdered. To know who murdered them and why, Sherlock was called.
In the last part of the story which is also the Denouement of the story, there is a confession made by Jim browner who had murdered both Mary and Alec. He gave a series of events for explaining the reasons why he had committed this crime. He explained that he did not like the closeness of Alec and Mary who was Jim's wife. So out of jealousy and frustration of their spoiled married life, he murdered both of them.
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
The fact that Bob Dylan was awarded a Nobel Prize was very controversial among the public. However, I believe that this award was justified.
Those who disagree with the decision argue that songs are not usually considered literature, and that the prize should only take into account works such as novels, short stories, poems and essays. Others have argued that, while influential, Dylan's songs do not have the quality that is often expected from a Nobel Prize winner.
However, I believe there are enough arguments to justify this decision. First, Dylan's songs are very complex and rich. They use a wide vocabulary and literary devices that are commonly found in works of great quality. Moreover, Dylan references many other works of great writers, such as Ezra Pound, Arthur Rimbaud and Paul Verlaine. This places his work in the literary canon. Finally, Dylan's lyrics have been very influential in cultural, literary and artistic circles. All of this justifies the committee's decision to award him the Nobel Prize.
