The founder of he Han dynasty was Liu Bang
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Economic freedom.
Explanation:
The economic reforms in China were initiated in 1978 by the pragmatist wing of the Chinese Communist Party, led by Deng Xiaoping, and continue to this day. The reformers set themselves the goal of creating sufficient surplus value to finance the modernization of the Chinese economy, which was on the brink of disaster as a result of the failure of the Great Leap Forward policy and the aftermath of the voluntaristic decisions taken under Mao Zedong. The initial task of the reforms was to solve the problem of motivating workers and peasants and eliminate economic imbalances.
Economic reforms have led to massive economic growth and changed the fortunes of hundreds of millions of Chinese, as more than 850 million people have been lifted out of poverty. In the West, economic reforms in China have been perceived by many as a transition to capitalism.
Because Slate was more common in wet microclimates.
Hope I Helped :)
Answer:
Trade unions in Africa have received a great deal of attention from various labour analysts, especially in regard to their contributions to the struggles against neoliberalism during the harsh time of structural adjustment programs. The kingdom of Swaziland (recently renamed as Eswatini) has constantly been faced with persistent labour unrests associated with increased demands for democratic openness (Simelane, 2016).
Locating trade union activism along these lines suggests that unions are neither delinked from the state nor regional or global institutions. Thus, as a way of consolidating their strategies, they make use of various public spaces, either at the local or international level to raise their grievances and issues. Like most of the civil society organisations, they can demonstrate leverage (capacity and power) to engage institutions at different geographical levels. This engagement shapes their strategies and practices as well as the various roles that trade union actors play in regional governance.
I don't know what you're referring to, and don't think it was much different than defending against a number of well-armed, trained, and disciplined troops. If anything, the German Army in WWII was a really tough bunch.
<span>Two things may show some differences, however, at least in the war in the Pacific. Japanese were far more willing to fight to the last man, rather than surrender, whereas most German units would stick the white flag up when it was clear that they had lost the engagement, and had no retreat. In "island hopping", the US also took on extremely fortified Japanese positions that were not destroyed with even massive bombing and naval fire</span>
